Attachment C - 2022-10-21_CoB_PSB Report_DRAFT

This is the text extracted from the file, without its layout, tables, or images. Use the original for anything that matters.

DRAFT

Attachement C

City of

Boulder Public Safety Building Options Analysis Image to be replaced

Photo credit

08/24/2022

DRAFT

Table of Contents OVERVIEW. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3

RECOMMENDATIONS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 22

Background, Current Conditions, and Methodology. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .4

Introduction to Options . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .23

FMP Implementation Project Team . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .5

Option 1A. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .24 Option 1B. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .26

FINDINGS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6

Option 2 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .28

Space Needs Methodology.. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7

Option 3. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 30

Existing Space Analysis. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .8 Basement Level Area Plan . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8 Main Level Area Plan . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9 Upper Level Area Plan. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 10 Table of Space Types . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 11 Standard Police Station Square Footage Comparisons. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 12 Square Footage Recommendations. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 13 Zoning Assessment.. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 14 Parking. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 15 Floodplain . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 16 Strategic Action: Deep Retrofit . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 17 Police Master Plan. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 18 Co-located Public Safety Buildings . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 19 The Pros of Co-location. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 19 The Cons of Co-location . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .20 Do the Pros Outweigh the Cons?. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .20 Reimagine Policing. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 21

Fair Use Notice: This document may contain copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. The authors of this document have included such material in an effort to advance understanding of the concepts presented herein. This document and the contents herein are not intended for commercial use or publication, nor are material images being presented for the purposes of use for this project. This limited usage constitutes a fair use of any such copyrighted material as provided by section 107 of the U.S. Copyright Law. Specifically, in accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material in this document is distributed for purpose of research and education. If a third party wishes to use copyrighted material from this document for alternative purposes that extend beyond fair use, that party must obtain permission from the copyright owner.

City of Boulder • Facilities Master Plan • Public Safety Building Options Analysis

DRAFT

Overview Background, Current Conditions, and Methodology FMP Implementation Project Team

City of Boulder • Facilities Master Plan • Public Safety Building Options Analysis

DRAFT

Background, Current Conditions, and Methodology Background

storage space for equipment, evidence, and vehicles. The majority of the Police Department Services are located at the PSB.

The Public Safety Building (PSB) at 1805 33rd Street has been operating as the Boulder Police Department’s primary facility since 1989. In 2013, the City of Boulder hired Trestle Strategy Group to conduct a facility evaluation and space needs assessment as part of their Master Plan Strategy. That assessment found the existing facility insufficient for the department’s needs in many areas. Its recommendation was that the facility needed approximately 25,000 additional square feet.

The original building is a labyrinth of rooms and is difficult to navigate. The interior layout also has presented challenges and the Police Department’s needs have shifted over the years. Methodology To gain full understanding of both the specific needs of the Boulder Police Department and also industry standards the design team conducted several types of research. The team met with representatives from the Police Department several times including a site walk and interviews. The interview questions were intended to find space constraints, inefficiencies, anticipated growth, and affinities within the building and units. We also examined the existing floor plans to calculate the square footage allocations by space type and per person in order to quantify the existing space constraints.

The City of Boulder is currently undertaking an effot to study the implementation options for the 2021 Facility Master Plan. This effort is focusing on the benefits of consolidating city departments and services to primarily two campuses. As part of this project, Studiotrope is leading this effort with the support from StudioTerra; financial analysis from (Kevin) BBC; and cost estimating from Symmetry to conduct cost-benefit analysis of various options for expansion and/or relocation of all or certain functions of the Public Safety Building. This effort includes reassessing the Police Department’s space needs.

In addition to this assessment, the team conducted external research to understand industry standards.

Current Conditions According to the assessor’s site, the original building was built in 1968. It is over 50 years old. An addition was built around 2005 that added a below grade firing range and a large training center including a large flexible meeting room.

This information was then aggregated to determine a recommended amount of square footage that would allow the Public Safety Building to effectively and efficiently operate including accounting for future growth. This space needs recommendation was then used to layout several options that took into account the constraints of the existing site and other site options. The team evaluated each option with a cost estimate of anticipated construction cost, performed a cost benefit analysis, and a pros and cons exercise.

The building houses multiple departments and funtions including the two main divisions of the Police Department, the Operations Division and the Support and Staff Services Division. The PSB includes space for training rooms, firearms range, locker and workout rooms, a communications center, a crime lab, as well as employee lounge, meeting rooms and Overview • Background, Current Conditions, and Methodology

City of Boulder • Facilities Master Plan • Public Safety Building Options Analysis

DRAFT

FMP Implementation Project Team Client Michele Crane, AIA, LEED AP | City of Boulder, Facilities Consolidation Analysis Lead Carol Adams, ASLA, PLA | StudioTerra, Inc. Financial Lead / Project Management Amanda Cole | Leadline, Inc. Financial Strategy/Approach Ameresco BBC Cost Estimation Symmetry Builders Civil Engineering Consulting Sanitas Architecture / Interior Design / Graphic Design Sage Case, LEED AP | Principal in Charge George Kincaid, RA | Project Manager Joseph Montalbano, RA | Principal of Architecture Roman Smith | Designer Peter Williams | Graphic Designer

Overview • FMP Implementation Project Team

City of Boulder • Facilities Master Plan • Public Safety Building Options Analysis

DRAFT

Findings Space Needs Methodology

Strategic Action: Deep Retrofit

Existing Space Analysis

Police Master Plan

Basement Level Area Plan

Co-located Public Safety Buildings

Main Level Area Plan

The Pros of Co-location

Upper Level Area Plan

The Cons of Co-location

Table of Space Types

Do the Pros Outweigh the Cons?

Standard Police Station Square Footage Comparisons

Reimagine Policing

Square Footage Recommendations Zoning Assessment Parking Floodplain

City of Boulder • Facilities Master Plan • Public Safety Building Options Analysis

DRAFT

Space Needs Methodology This analysis is employing a similar methodology to that being used for the FMP Consolidation effort. The project team extensively analyzed several case studies to determine the ideal methodology to determine square footage needs across all of the City of Boulder Departments and Divisions. These Case Studies relevant to the future of the workplace have been used to determine the target square footage needs for the Departments and Divisions that are part of the FMP Consolidation. This study involved analyzing the existing uses within the Public Safety Building through these categories and developing a recommendation based on this methodology being utilized

Basis-of-Design Square Footage numbers were used for the following space types: • Customer Interaction Spaces • Departments’ Unique Spaces • Departments’ Specific Storage Needs These numbers were determined through interviewing the Police Department and discussing their specific needs for all of their unique spaces and storage needs. The final Square Footage target ranges were determined based on a department’s existing square footage, requested ideal square footage and consolidation synergies.

A combined Multiplier was used to determine an appropriate target range for the following space types which are common across workplaces: • Workspaces • Collaboration Spaces • Base Amenities • Core Circulation

The final recommended square footage needs were also checked against similar industry standard minimums as well as percentage of overall space type.

The same multiplier was used for all staff regardless of whether a desk worker or a field worker. Our analysis has shown that staff that may need less than the typical desk space typically need more collaboration space. Research has also shown that the hybrid work environment does not typically reduce the overall square footage needs; it has however changed how the square footage is used. For example, well-equipped hybrid work environments provide more collaborative spaces, more individual focus spaces that are acoustically isolated for virtual calls and, in general, a broader variety of spaces to efficiently work from rather than a more traditional office layout with open cubicles and private offices.

Image placeholder Findings • Space Needs Methodology

City of Boulder • Facilities Master Plan • Public Safety Building Options Analysis

DRAFT

Existing Space Analysis Basement Level Area Plan

BASE AMENITIES

229 SF

CORE & CIRCULATION

1,835 SF

UNIQUE SPACES

4,746 SF

EQUIP. CLEANING 246 SF

CONTROL 151 SF

TOTAL SQUARE FOOTAGE

VEST. 109 SF

199 SF

6,811 SF

STAIR 197 SF

RR 145 SF

FIRING RANGE ADDITION 4,242 SF HALL

JAN. 85 SF

985 SF

STG 205 SF

STAIR 248 SF

Findings • Existing Space Analysis

City of Boulder • Facilities Master Plan • Public Safety Building Options Analysis

DRAFT

Main Level Area Plan

BASE AMENITIES

1,200 SF

TRAINING SPACE 1,007 SF

COLLABORATION SPACES

382 SF

CORE & CIRCULATION

6,980 SF

32 SF

MECH SHAFT

ELEC OFFICES 241 SF

ELEV.

MEETING ROOM

OFFICES 237 SF

344 SF

1,046 SF

DEPT. SPECIFIC STORAGE

6,478 SF

UNIQUE SPACES

3,583 SF

OFFICES 763 SF

OFFICE

408 SF

528 SF

MAINT. 526 SF

HALLWAY

402 SF

STORAGE 1,859 SF

3,762 SF LOCKERS

STAIRS

RR OFFICES 418 SF

OFFICE 228 SF

90 SF BRIEFING ROOM

OFFICE 169 SF

CRIME LAB 1,230 SF

368 SF

STG STAIRS

341 SF

602 SF PROPERTY & EVIDENCE

STG 230 SF

1,391 SF ELEC. 73 SF

ANIMAL CONTROL OFFICE 394 SF

RR 224 SF

STG 69 SF

382 SF

160 SF

10,624 SF

CONF. ROOM

OFFICES P & E STORAGE

48 SF

STG

327 SF

1,859 SF

HALLWAY

TOTAL SQUARE FOOTAGE

394 SF

COMPUTER LAB

EQUIP STG 184 SF

433 SF

OFFICE

WORKSPACE

STG 331 SF

SWAT STG

146 SF

ARMORY

VESTIBULE

STAIRS

29 SF

DUI INTAKE

173 SF

307 SF

CUSTOMER INTERACTION SPACES

31 SF

30,294 SF

WATCH III 298 SF

OFFICE SPACE 2,475 SF

INTERVIEW ROOMS 191 SF

STAIRS 219 SF OFFICE SPACE 4,140 SF

LOBBY 1,046 SF RR

FILES 264 SF

331 SF

ELEV/STAIRS 593 SF

Findings • Existing Space Analysis

City of Boulder • Facilities Master Plan • Public Safety Building Options Analysis

DRAFT

Upper Level Area Plan

BASE AMENITIES

2,136 SF

IDF 575 SF ELEC. 159 SF

COLLABORATION SPACES 5,921 SF MECH SHAFT

CORE & CIRCULATION

7,608 SF

ELEC. CL 94 SF

ELEV 123 SF OFFICE 286 SF

TRAINING COMPUTER LAB

COMMUNUTY SERVICES 841 SF

OFFICE 215 SF STG. 59 SF

DEPT. SPECIFIC STORAGE

847 SF

EXT. COURT OPEN TO BELOW

STAIRS

WORKSPACE TOTAL SQUARE FOOTAGE

6,667 SF

STG.

OFFICES 455 SF

257 SF

52 SF

298 SF

338 SF RR

EXT. COURT OPEN TO BELOW

SLEEP CENTER 357 SF

OFFICE 383 SF

615 SF

MEN'S LOCKER ROOM

ELEV

WEIGHT ROOM

1,792 SF

33,267 SF

WOMEN'S LOCKER ROOM

389 SF

OFFICES 355 SF

STORAGE 221 SF

LOCKERS

LUNCH ROOM 747 SF

TRAINING / MEETING ROOMS 4,644 SF

100 SF

STAIRS

2,564 SF

9,803 SF

P&E STG

267 SF

HALLWAY

LOUNGE/BRIDGE

UNIQUE SPACES

MEETING ROOM

3,271 SF

225 SF

284 SF

574 SF

STORAGE

CUSTOMER INTERACTION SPACES

DISPATCH 3,597 SF

EMERGENCY OPERATIONS CENTER

657 SF

1,117 SF

STG. 82 SF

AUDIO 104 SF

CIRCULATION

STG. STAIR 191 SF

STG. 87 SF

615 SF

248 SF

MEETING ROOM

RR 38 SF

CONFERENCE ROOM 382 SF

CONFERENCE ROOM 243 SF RR

OFFICES

CONFERENCE ROOM 385 SF

1,099 SF P&E STG 105 SF

INTERVIEW ROOM OFFICES

OFFICES

207 SF

129 SF

523 SF WORKSPACE

126 SF

636 SF

1,667 SF 284 SF

ELEV 69 SF

Findings • Existing Space Analysis

CIRCULATION 418 SF

City of Boulder • Facilities Master Plan • Public Safety Building Options Analysis

DRAFT

Table of Space Types Space Types and Notes

Recommendations

Existing SF

Recommended SF

70,372 sf

97,000 sf

183 sf per staff, 334 staff count

44,914 sf

60,939 sf

Increase based on standard multiplier

3,566 sf

Increase based on standard multiplier

6,303 sf

Increase based on standard multiplier

16,423 sf

The findings from the 2014 Needs Assessment are still applicable. The current workspaces are overcrowded and noisy throughout the building. This compromises the efficiencies and opportunities for collaborative work. The existing building is limited in it’s capacity to improve on these conditions.

Increase based on standard multiplier

17,291 sf

The existing lobby space is found to be an inefficient use of space. It would be beneficial to have a secure waiting area that would be able to acccommodate 12-24 visitors.

Increase by 10 yr growth factor (10%)

1,330 sf

1,463 sf

25,459 sf

34,597 sf

Firing Range

The existing underground firing range is a unique facility in the area and is a highly valued training facility.

No increase recommended

4,748 sf

Dispatch Sleep Center Briefing Room

The existing facililty is sufficient in size per the Police Dept.

No increase recommended

3,597 sf

The existing facililty is sufficient in size per the Police Dept.

Increase by 10 yr growth factor (10%)

357 sf

393 sf

The existing facililty is not sufficient in size and is not capable of adequately accommodating if all three watches are briefed together. Requested to accommodate 25 people comfortably.

Increase in size by 40%

602 sf

843 sf

Training Computer Lab Computer Lab

The existing facililty is sufficient in size per the Police Dept.

Increase by 10 yr growth factor (10%)

657 sf

723 sf

The existing facililty is not sufficient in size. Room needs to accommodate 8-10 workstations for officers to fill out reports.

Increase in size by 50%

408 sf

612 sf

Increase by 10 yr growth factor (10%)

3,913 sf

4,304 sf

Increase by 10 yr growth factor (10%)

574 sf

631 sf

Increase by 10 yr growth factor (10%)

1,230 sf

1,353 sf

Increase by 10 yr growth factor (10%)

320 sf

352 sf

Increase by 10 yr growth factor (10%)

1,007 sf

1,108 sf

No increase Recommended

575 sf

The existing facililty is sufficient in size per the Police Dept.

Increase by 10 yr growth factor (10%)

146 sf

161 sf

The former Sally Port has been converted into training space. Recommended adding back and should be similiar to two car garage.

Add new sally port

The existing facililty is significantly undersized. Needs are for a space 3x in size.

Increase by 300%

3,455 sf

10,365 sf

Increase by 10 yr growth factor (10%)

3,870 sf

4,257 sf

PUBLIC SAFETY BUILDING TOTALS Multiplier Spaces Base Amenities (Wellness, Copy, Mail, Rooms, basic storage, Restrooms, Kitchenette, Cafeteria, Jan closets)

Collaboration Spaces (small, medium, and large meeting rooms and storage)

Core & Circulation (hallways, elevators, stairs, LAN, Mech, Elec Rm, Elev. Rm) Workspace (office w/ walls and door and open office system workstations)

Customer Interaction Spaces (Lobby, Waiting Area)

The findings from the 2014 Needs Assessment are still applicable. The building lacks sufficient meeting space in overall square footage as well as number and variety of meeting spaces provided.

Dept. Unique Spaces and Specific Storage

Locker Rooms and Weight Room Emergency Operations Center Crime Lab Interview Rooms

Training Space IDF DUI Intake Sally Port Property & Evidence Storage General Dept. Storage

The existing facililty is sufficient in size per the Police Dept. The existing facililty is sufficient in size per the Police Dept.

576 sf

ANNEXES Annex Location

Findings • Existing Space Analysis

Currently there is one annex at 1500 Pearl. Ideally the Police Dept. would have facilities at the following areas, Downtown, Table Mesa, East Boulder, and North Boulder. These should accommodate 4-6 officers with workspace, break room, restroom, showers and lockers. (6) requested parking spaces, 4 min at each location.

1,400 sf per location

City of Boulder • Facilities Master Plan • Public Safety Building Options Analysis

DRAFT

Standard Police Station Square Footage Comparisons Existing SF/Employee Count 70,373 SF/295 Employees 235 SF/Employee

1. Peoria Police Department - Arizona Population: 168,196 Square Footage: 94,356 sq ft Employees: 344 Square Footage/Employee: 274 sf/employee Lot Size: 709,592 SF

Average of Police Departments serving similar sized populations 290 SF/Staff Count [PSB would be 15,177 SF larger (120%)]

2. West Jordan Police Department - Utah Population: 114,138 Square Footage: 51,604 sq ft Employees: Full Time Sworn Officers - 102; Civilians - 41 Square Footage/Employee: 360 sf/employee Lot Size: 118,048 SF

Minimum Recommendation 250 SF/Employee [PSB would be 3,377 SF larger (105%)]

The industry standard size of police stations can very dramatically from district to district due to unique operations and significantly different case loads, both of which greatly impact space needs.

3. Lowell Police Department - Massachusetts Population: 111,306 Square Footage: 110,350 sq ft Employees: Full Time Sworn Officers - 239; Full Time Civilians - 108 Square Footage/Employee: 318 sf/employee Lot Size: 117,489 SF

On the right we have included the size of police stations in the U.S. with similar populations to Boulder. This found an average of 290 sf/ employee. In California, 250 sf/employee serves as minimum threshold, where any less would result in significantly more complaints regarding the size of the facility being inadequate.

Findings • Standard Police Station Square Footage Comparisons

4. Davie Police Department - Florida Population: 104,399 Square Footage: 60,279 sq ft Employees: Police Officers - 213; Support Staff - 76 Square Footage/Employee: 208 sf/employee Lot Size: 344,973 SF

City of Boulder • Facilities Master Plan • Public Safety Building Options Analysis

DRAFT

Square Footage Recommendations Total Recommended Building Size 97,000 SF

Staff Counts

97,000 SF/334 Employees

299 8

[includes (4) CIRT, (1) PIP, (2) IT, (1) Risk Mgmt staff]

291 Total Number of Police Department Staff working at PSB

291 SF/Employee

[includes (106) Field Staff and (185) Non-Field Staff]

Multiplier Comparison for Standard Office Bldg Spaces

Total Number of Police Department Staff working at Annex currently

Total Number of Additional Staff anticipated in 10 yrs [includes (10-20) Field Staff and (5-10)]

Existing SF/Employee Count: 44,914 SF/295 Employees 146 SF/Employee

334

Total Number of Additional Staff anctipated in 10 yrs at PSB [includes (325) Total Police Dept and other (9)staff currently at PSB]

FMP Standard Multiplier for typical City of Boulder Office Space 183 SF/Employee

11,000 Anticipated Population Growth with East Boulder Subcommunity Plan 351

Existing Space Analysis

Total Number of Police Department Staff anctipated with this growth [based on ratio of current population/staff count and to be accommodated at PSB and additional annexes]

To meet the current and future needs, this study used the methodology as outlined previously. This study finds the current and future facility needs are 97,000 square feet at the public safety building, which results in a 26,000 square foot shortage. This aligns with our industry standard findings in terms of square footage needs per employee. To account for future growth, we used the 10 year growth projection provided by the Police Department. It is anticipated that additional growth required beyond the 334 staff at the PSB will be accommodated through the use of requested annexes.

The existing building is sized to meet the demands of the Boulder Police Department at the time of construction, 1989. The building has been remodeled and reconfigured significantly over the years to meet the needs of the Police Department as it has grown and its space needs have changed. The existing building has reached it’s functional capacity and no longer can meet all the need of the Police Department. To address the needs of the police department, more square footage is necessary through either an addition or new building. Findings • Square Footage Recommendations

Total Number of Staff working at PSB Total Number of non Police Department Staff working at PSB

City of Boulder • Facilities Master Plan • Public Safety Building Options Analysis

DRAFT

Zoning Assessment Existing Zoning Regulation • District I2, Industrial-General • Allowable Height - 40’ max • Allowable Stories - 3 • Primary Street Setback - 20’ • Side Street Setback - 15’ • Side Interior Setback from Interior Lot Line - 0’ - 12’ • Rear Setback - 20’ • FAR = 0.5 • Parking Requirements - 1 space per 400 sf of building area

Building Floor Area for FAR Calculation: Basement 7,060 SF First Floor - 29,789 SF Detached Storage Building - 4,089 SF Second Floor - 31,146 SF Total Existing -

72,084 SF

Allowable Building Size

ALLOWABLE BUILDABLE VOLUME WITH SETBACKS AND MAXIMUM HEIGHT

MAX SIZE OF ADDITION = 17,000 SF PARCEL SQUARE FOOTAGE 177,084 SF

With the floor area ratio (FAR) being 0.5 for a 177,000 square foot site, the max allowable building area is 88,922 square feet. Any building area addition would have to be minimal without rezoning the property or relocating.

EXISTING BUILDING: 72,084 SF

THE PRIVATE ROAD IS UNDERSTOOD TO REMAIN. COB PLANS TO ADD AN EASEMENT EXTENDING ACCESS ON THE PROPERTY TO THE WEST

EXISTING STORAGE 4,089 SF

ALLOWABLE BUILDING AREA: 88,992 SF FLOOR AREA RATIO: 0.5

Findings • Zoning Assessment

City of Boulder • Facilities Master Plan • Public Safety Building Options Analysis

DRAFT

Parking Max Allowable Parking

Current Fleet and Requested Storage Type Needs

• 88,992/400 = 223 parking spaces required per zoning at max square footage allowed • Current parking spaces = 233

115 8 7 2 5

Surface parking is insufficient for current needs based on use with employees often parking offsite in surrounding area, but is sufficient for current zoning requirements if existing count is maintained. Structured parking would be required to meet additional parking needs. The Police Department has several unique vehicles with sensitive equipment that would benefit from stored in a conditioned and covered parking structure.

Typical size vehicles (enhanced security/uncovered parking) Motorcycles (enhanced security/uncovered parking) Trailers (enhanced security/uncovered parking) Unique Vehicles (enhanced security/uncovered parking) Unique Vehicles (enhanced security/covered/conditioned parking)

Existing Parking Site Plan

Findings • Parking

City of Boulder • Facilities Master Plan • Public Safety Building Options Analysis

DRAFT

Floodplain • Property is within 500 Year Floodplain • Floodproofing required and/or addition raised above flood protection elevation • The building classifies as a critical facility and is required to meet regulations governing the 100 year floodplain Floodproofing is described as a combination of adjustments and/or additions of features to buildings that eliminate or reduce the potential for flood damage. Examples of floodproofing include anchoring of the building to resist flotation, collapse, and lateral movement; installation of watertight closures for doors and windows; reinforcement of walls to withstand floodwater pressures and impact forces from floating debris; use of membranes and other sealants to reduce seepage; installation of pumps to control interior water levels; check valves to prevent the entrance of floodwater; and location of electrical , mechanical, utility, and other valuable damageable equipment above the expected flood level. Floodproofing means making a building watertight, substantially impermeable to floodwaters.

loo f 3 201

din

ve ge

t bou a ? ote d his t c e r an e fo d n d o a has o wh

Findings • Floodplain

City of Boulder • Facilities Master Plan • Public Safety Building Options Analysis

DRAFT

Strategic Action: Deep Retrofit The existing building is inefficient and has one of the highest EUI rates across the City of Boulder’s portfolio. The existing HVAC systems date to 2011 and 2006 and would likley be due for replacement at the time of future renovations. Police Stations do have a higher demand for energy than a typical office building due to their 24 hour operations, but there is opportunity for significant energy use reduction.

Case Study References

Target Energy Use Intensity

Current Energy Use Intensity:

69.9 kbtu/SF

35 kbtu/SF

City and County of Denver “Building Typology and Energy Use” Report by Group 14 • EUI Target for Police Station • 45.6 kbtu/SF Energy Star Portfolio Manager “U.S. National Median Reference Values for All Portfolio Manager Property Types” • EUI Median Value for Police Station • 63.5 kbtu/SF

Key Findings: In order to achieve all of the following goals City of Boulder Energy Conservation Code Compliance Path • Meet PSB programmatic requirements Any addition would need to meet the new construction requirements via the Total • Significant improvement to layout and allocation of programmatic elements at Building performance compliance method. Any significant alteration of the existing existing building City of Boulder Energy Conservation Codeenergy improvements to the existing building (>50% work area) would trigger significant These would require an Addition and Level 03/04 Alteration (>50% work area) building. • Meet City of Boulder’s Energy and Climate goals Meet new construction requirements • Comply with City of Boulder Energy Conservation Code alone or if existing building and addition Addition complies as single building These would require a Level 04 Alteration (changes to the mech/lighting systems and building envelope upgrades) Level 01 (removal/replacement of materials, elements, equipment, fixtures for same purpose)

a major renovation would require a Deep Energy Retrofit of the existing building

Level 02 (reconfiguration of space, add/remove door, reconfig/extension of any system)

“A Deep Retrofit, commonly known in the industry as a Deep Energy Retrofit, is a whole building approach to renewal and revitalization of a structure that results in significant energy efficiency – normally more than 50%, and extensive renovation and refresh of the interior which meets needs and goals of the community and population the building serves.”

Findings • Strategic Action: Deep Retrofit

Alteration

Level 03 (work area > 50% of building area)

proposed EUI shall < 125% of EUI permitted in Chapter 4

Level 04

proposed EUI shall < 110% of EUI permitted

(work area > 50% of building area, mech/lighting systems substantially replaced, substantial structural alteration, fenestration replacement)

City of Boulder • Facilities Master Plan • Public Safety Building Options Analysis

DRAFT

Police Master Plan The Boulder Police Department, in partnership with other city colleagues, is working to make significant changes in the midst of local and national discussions around the need for reform in policing. The master planning process will provide a framework for the department to do a broader and more in-depth examination of community input, use datadriven strategies to review current operations in the context of changing conditions and determine future policing goals and strategies. This master plan will be used as the roadmap for creating meaningful changes to public safety in Boulder. An in-depth examination of community needs and utilization of police department resources is currently underway. Focus Areas include; • Partnering with Community • Building positive relationships with community members and neighborhoods

Image placeholder

outside of emergencies • Proactive, problem-solving partnerships • Two-way communication and education to help the community and department understand each other’s needs, challenges and successes Value Statements include;

Next Steps

We feel safe in our community when:

Engagement Window IV (late July/early August –– Sept.. 2022)

• We are all free to enjoy public and private spaces without fear of harm

Although Window IV is the last major community engagement window of the project,

• We demonstrate we are a compassionate community that supports the basic

people will have one more opportunity to comment on a revised plan at a meeting of the Reimagine Policing Process Subcommittee – currently planned for October of

needs and the right to be free from crime for all community members

2022. In addition, all master plans in the city must be adopted by City Council with

• Officers are part of the communities they serve, building relationships and

opportunities for feedback during that process.

understanding and addressing problems before having to step up enforcement and resort to force. Findings • Police Master Plan

City of Boulder • Facilities Master Plan • Public Safety Building Options Analysis

DRAFT

Co-located Public Safety Buildings The Pros of Co-location

The U.S. Department of Justice’s Office of Community Oriented Policing Services (COPS) oversaw the President’s Task Force on 21st Century Policing who formally issued a final report in May, 2015.

Can do more The economy of scale and ability to share costs allow public safety buildings to expend more of their limited funds on specialty features such as exterior wall protections, bullet-proof glass, etc.

“Trust between law enforcement agencies and the people they protect and serve is essential in a democracy. It is key to the stability of our communities, the integrity of our criminal justice system, and the safe and effective delivery of policing services.” —Executive Summary introduction to the report

Improved efficiency Public safety building forms and configurations must cater to specific processes and procedures and this often requires more space. This demand can be offset by the efficiencies gained by sharing common areas with other tenants in the same building or other buildings on the same campus.

The Task Force studied ways to improve police-community relations throughout the country, and in its final report emphasized the need to adopt community oriented policing – a law enforcement strategy that focuses on positive, non-punitive, and non-enforcement contact with the public as a means to build trust and promote safety.

Makes projects viable Oftentimes two or more agencies cannot afford to build or even adequately operate a stand-alone facility on their own, but sharing capital and operating costs suddenly makes a project viable.

Furthermore, integration and relationship-building with the community was determined to be a significant component of effective law enforcement. Community oriented policing is not a new concept, but it has shifted to the number one priority of many agencies in recent years.

Increased inclusion Sharing spaces encourages interactions that can effectively address underlying issues and change negative behavioral patterns relative to equality and inclusion. When co-located tenants are interactive instead of isolated, they engage in problem solving together.

Knowing this, some police agencies across the U.S. have chosen to colocate their stations with other government buildings. In fact, some have argued there is a noticeable trend for co-location beyond government buildings, with some jurisdictions co-locating services adjacent to public parks, commercial and residential developments.

Spontaneous collaboration The operational benefits of sharing space is not always measurable, namely because these benefits are the result of informal interactions. Often these informal interactions fit the definition of the type of nonenforcement contact that build trust between law enforcement officers and the communities they serve.

Can co-location contribute to the goals and tenets of community oriented policing by virtue of increasing non-enforcement contact between law enforcement officers and the general public?

Findings • Co-located Public Safety Buildings

City of Boulder • Facilities Master Plan • Public Safety Building Options Analysis

DRAFT

The Cons of Co-location

Do the Pros Outweigh the Cons?

Competing priorities Public safety buildings require enhanced security, privacy, and control of ingress and egress. This is often at odds with the other tenants of the shared facility who require welcoming and open public spaces.

Research of co-location projects across the spectrum suggests the pros will outweigh the cons if the decision to co-locate is driven by purpose. The opposite is also true; there are plenty of examples of co-located projects that are unsuccessful, and these are the result of a lack of purpose. In other words: if the co-location is driven by convenience, it will have more challenges than if all tenants are driven by a shared desire and intent to:

Fleet parking requirements Police stations require substantially more parking space than other buildings due to accommodating both personal and squad automobiles, along with specialty vehicles. Often this need results in large, secured paved areas that can disrupt other project goals like walkability, higher densities, and programmable outdoor spaces.

Seek synergies By sharing space each tenant can expect to attract more foot traffic than if they were isolated. This increased activity can support the cause of each agency, and create a vibe that causes each party to feel stronger together. It can also generate pride for being a participant in the synergistic experience itself. These synergies have proven to improve cooperation among all building occupants and each of the visitors they attract.

Challenging negotiations Agreeing on important design and operational decisions requires a strong alignment across the leadership of all parties co-locating on a single property. When these parties are numerous or changing, it can require a great deal of time and energy that was not anticipated.

Improve resilience Sharing infrastructure, by default, creates a bit of redundancy in systems which, in turn, can improve resiliency of an entire community. For example, critical necessities such as clean water supply, power generation, and fuel storage could become fail-safe when resources are compounded.

Having roommates Sharing spaces requires rules that can sometimes be unusual or unexpected to other tenants. Operating hours, room scheduling, custodial and building maintenance routines, and acoustical expectations must all be clearly defined and respected.

Build partnerships Inter-connectedness between city and county agencies, businesses, nonprofits, and educational institutions, when coupled with policing, can strengthen a community via shared missions and objectives. One example of this is partnerships around mental health initiatives, both for police officers and the community members they serve.

Space needs Training equipment, evidence storage, and case files are just a few examples of the unique needs of a police facility. Blending these seamlessly with more common spaces can be challenging.

Findings • Co-located Public Safety Buildings

DRAFT

City of Boulder • Facilities Master Plan • Public Safety Building Options Analysis

DRAFT

Reimagine Policing

Reimagined policing requires a reimagined building to serve your goals.

exemplifies inclusiveness

Serendipitous Discovery

creative contributions

Casual Interaction (multi-gen)

participation, innovation, and collaboration Team Based

SOCIALIZATION

SHARING

Learning Out Loud (open)

Progressive Partnerships

Enriched Collaboration peer-to-peer interaction

DRAFT

A reimagined building can deploy any number of environmental design techniques that are instrumental in increasing the number of police interactions of the non-emergency type. For example, these might include shared spaces such as: • community rooms for proactive, problem-solving partnerships • galleries to inform the community of police successes and challenges • training facilities to teach communities how to reduce or prevent crime • exercise and other athletic equipment or play fields for pick-up games • green space for leisure and prolonged interactions • food and beverage halls for a interactive dining experiences

The Boulder Police Department’s vision for the future – as well as the future of the community you serve – should all inform the design of your policing facilities. The building can do more than provide the functionality needed for policing; it can be a catalyst for integrating law enforcement officers with the Boulder community. This is achievable.

Sense of Ownership

DRAFT

There is compelling evidence in the research done by social scientists that connectivity is what causes communities to embrace. Connectivity between a community and their police force is primarily limited to emergency needs, which primarily and unfortunately are not prolonged interactions but rather transactional.

Police departments are operations-focused, and rightfully so. The research presented herein, however, is focused on how the facilities that support policing operations can enable, encourage, enhance, or even ensure the Boulder Police Department achieves the goals of your Reimagine Policing Plan.

Sense of Community

DRAFT

Feeling Healthy

optimized for personal needs

Learners / Experts / Tools

e anc h C mal r o f “In

s”

UNITY

EMPOWERMENT

Sense of Belonging

Flexibility or Rules flexible & permissive

Exposure

well-informed and tolerant

Diagram showing how social infrastructure can yield a unified community

Findings • Co-located Public Safety Buildings

City of Boulder • Facilities Master Plan • Public Safety Building Options Analysis

DRAFT

Recommendations Introduction to Options Option 1A Option 1B Option 2 Option 3

City of Boulder • Facilities Master Plan • Public Safety Building Options Analysis

DRAFT

Introduction to Options Based on the findings from the space needs assessment and site analysis, the team has developed some potential options to address the needs identified. These options are presented on the following pages with diagrams showing potential conceptual massing solutions and key aspects of each option

BUILT ON A SOLID FOUNDATION

Scorecards Each option has also been evaluated in two ways. • The Public Safety Building (PSB) scorecard evaluates each option in several key factors relating to how well each would meet the identified space needs as well as several factors related to constructibility and impact to future needs. The grading is done on a sliding scale on whether that key factor is a pro or a con for the option. • The 2nd one is the Facility Master Plan (FMP) scorecard. This one evaluates each option in the same way that the Facility Master Plan has evaluted each building across the City of Boulder’s portfolio. This is based on the FMP’s guiding principles and organized around the three pillars.

OUR BUILT FUTURE E N R I C H I N G

Recommendations • Introduction to Options

O UR

L I V E S

T H R O U G H

B U I L D I N G S

City of Boulder • Facilities Master Plan • Public Safety Building Options Analysis

DRAFT

Option 1A Renovation and Addition at 1805 33rd Street This option keeps the PSB at the existing location and maximizes allowable floor area per the F.A.R. restrictions within the current zoning for the property.

DRAFT

KEY STATS Existing Bldg to be Renovated = 72,000sf Addition = 16,900 sf TOTAL = 88,900 (Amount short of recommendation = 8,100 sf) SF per Staff ratio: 88,900/334 = 266 SF per Staff

ADDITION W/ SURFACE PARKING BELOW (16,900 sf)

This option would achieve: •

Maintains the same level of flood vulnerability

•

All-electric building with Net Zero potential

•

Increased energy efficiency

•

Carbon Footprint Savings through reuse of existing building

•

Improved ADA accessibility

•

Per FMP guidelines, inclusivity and accessibility would remain the same

•

Increased square footage

EXISTING BUILDING RENOVATION:(72,084 sf) EXISTING STORAGE REMAINS

To accomplish this would require: •

Deep Energy Retrofit •

•

Majority of Building Systems (HVAC) will be replaced in full. (likely at end of useful life at time of project)

• Extensive upgrades to exterior envelope to meet Boulder Energy Code Partial renovation of existing building to improve layout and accommodate enlarging select existing programmatic elements

•

A large addition would be constructed to increase square footage. •

Raised Construction to avoid floodplain and maintain surface parking below

•

High performance construction

Addition will reduce amount of parking; a raised parking structure will be req’d •

Elevated parking structure with surface parking below

•

Maintains same # of parking spaces which exceeds zoning req’s

PARKING STRUCTURE (12,600 sf)

Construction would be phased and complex to maintain key functions of the

ALLOWABLE BUILDABLE VOLUME WITH SETBACKS AND MAXIMUM HEIGHT

existing building operational

Recommendations • Option 1A

City of Boulder • Facilities Master Plan • Public Safety Building Options Analysis

DRAFT

FMP Scorecard

PSB Scorecard CONS

1. Meets PSB Needs Increased interior square footage

PROS

Less

Secure Fleet Parking

Yes

Addition of Sally Port

Yes

$$$

Challenging

Easy

Challenging

Easy

This option does not meet the recommended square footage.

Firing Range This option does not meet the recommended square footage.

Conditioned Storage for Specialty Vehicles This option does not meet the recommended square footage.

2. Construction Considerations Construction Cost Phasing This option presents some phasing challenges, with a significant interior renovation of the existing building.

Constructabillity Renovations are challenging.

3. Facility Opportunities/Constraints Future Growth Potential

Limited

Opportunistic

Limited

Opportunistic

This option maxes out the allowable building size within existing zoning.

Building Form Potential The existing site and building significantly limit the options for building form for the addition.

Recommendations • Option 1A

City of Boulder • Facilities Master Plan • Public Safety Building Options Analysis

DRAFT

Option 1B Renovation and Addition at 1805 33rd Street This option keeps the PSB at the existing location and increases square footage to the recommended facility size. This requires the property to be rezoned to increase the Floor Area Ratio from the current zoning limit. This would require increasing the F.A.R. from 0.5 to at least 0.55. This option would achieve: •

Maintains the same level of flood vulnerability

•

All-electric building with Net Zero potential

•

Increased energy efficiency

•

Carbon Footprint Savings through reuse of existing building

•

Improved ADA accessibility

•

Per FMP guidelines, inclusivity and accessibility would remain the same

•

Increased square footage

DRAFT

STATS Existing Bldg to be Renovated = 72,000sf Addition = 25,000 sf TOTAL = 97,000 SF per Staff ratio: 97,000/334 = 290 SF per Staff

ADDITION W/ SURFACE PARKING BELOW (25,000 sf) EXISTING BUILDING RENOVATION:(72,084 sf) EXISTING STORAGE REMAINS

To accomplish this would require: •

Deep Energy Retrofit •

•

Majority of Building Systems (HVAC) will be replaced in full. (likely at end of useful life at time of project)

• Extensive upgrades to exterior envelope to meet Boulder Energy Code Partial renovation of existing building to improve layout and accommodate enlarging select existing programmatic elements

•

A large addition would be constructed to increase square footage. •

Raised Construction to avoid floodplain and maintain surface parking below

•

High performance construction

Addition will reduce amount of parking; a raised parking structure will be req’d •

Elevated parking structure with surface parking below

•

Meets zoning req’s for parking (243 spaces) - increase of 10 spaces from

PARKING STRUCTURE (17,000 sf)

existing conditions •

ALLOWABLE BUILDABLE VOLUME WITH SETBACKS AND MAXIMUM HEIGHT

Construction would be phased and complex to maintain key functions of the existing building operational

•

Lengthy entitlement process to rezone the property

Recommendations • Option 1B

City of Boulder • Facilities Master Plan • Public Safety Building Options Analysis

DRAFT

Increased interior square footage

CONS

PROS

Less

Secure Fleet Parking

Yes

Addition of Sally Port

Yes

This option does not meet the recommended square footage.

Conditioned Storage for Specialty Vehicles This option does not meet the recommended square footage.

Phasing

$$$

Challenging

Easy

This option presents some phasing challenges, with a significant interior renovation of the existing building.

Constructabillity

Challenging

Easy

Renovations are challenging.

3. Facility Opportunities/Constraints Future Growth Potential

Limited

Opportunistic

Limited

Opportunistic

This option limits options on the site

Building Form Potential The existing site and building significantly limit the options for building form for the addition.

Recommendations • Option 1B

KPI 1: KPI 2: KPI 3: KPI 4: KPI 5:

DRAFT

Letter B+

Flood Vulnerability Wild Fire Vulnerability Disaster Readiness Community Shelter "Essential" building

Sustainable (core value weighting=10%)

Accessible and Equitable (core value weighting=5%)

C+

Experiential (core value weighting=20%)

B-

Economical (core value weighting=5%)

Functional (core value weighting=30%)

B+

Overall Score

KPI 1: KPI 2: KPI 3:

2. Construction Considerations Construction Cost

DRAFT

Resilient (core value weighting=30%)

KPI 1: KPI 2: KPI 3: KPI 4:

This option does not meet the recommended square footage.

Firing Range

DRAFT

FMP Scorecard

PSB Scorecard 1. Meets PSB Needs

DRAFT

KPI 1: KPI 2: KPI 1: KPI 2: KPI 3: KPI 1: KPI 2: KPI 3:

MEP Deferral Backlog Building Energy Use Intensity (EUI) Carbon Footprint Transportations Emissions Reductions ADA Compliance Inclusivity Accessibility

Facility experience for the Community Facility experience for Staff Capital Needs per Square Foot Operating Costs per Square Foot The Facility Condition Index (FCI) Maintenance and Operability of Facility Facility Adaptability Facility Security

DRAFT

# 3.20 1 4 3 3 5 2.75 4 3 3 1 2.33 4 1 2 2.50 1 4 4.00 4 4 4 3.33 3 3 4

3.05

City of Boulder • Facilities Master Plan • Public Safety Building Options Analysis

DRAFT

Option 2 Renovation and Addition at 1805 33rd Street This option keeps the PSB at the existing location, but replaces the existing facility with a new energy efficient building.. This requires the property to be rezoned to increase the Floor Area Ratio from the current zoning limit. This would require increasing the F.A.R. from 0.5 to at least 0.55.

Maintains the same level of flood vulnerability

•

All-electric building with Net Zero potential

•

Increased energy efficiency

•

Embodied Energy saving of existing building lost

•

Improved ADA accessibility

•

Per FMP guidelines, inclusivity and accessibility would remain the same

•

Increased square footage

•

Enclosed garage for specialty vehicles

DRAFT

STATS Existing Bldg to remain = 7,000sf New Build = 90,000 sf TOTAL = 97,000 SF per Staff ratio: 97,000/334 = 290 SF per Staff

SURFACE PARKING AND OUTDOOR PLAZA

This option would achieve: •

DRAFT

PARKING STRUCTURE (29,000 sf) APPARATUS BAY STRUCTURE

To accomplish this would require: •

•

New Building •

High Performance construction

•

Floodproof construction

Existing underground firing range facility salvaged and incorporated into design of new building.

•

Raised parking structure will be req’d •

Meets zoning req’s for parking (243 spaces) - increase of 10 spaces from existing conditions

•

Apparatus Bay Structure for specialty vehicle parking

•

Construction would be phased and complex to maintain key functions of the existing building operational. •

EXISTING UNDERGROUND FIRING RANGE FACILITY (7,000 sf)

(The existing south addition would be demolished and new building would be built on the south end of the property. When complete the original building would be deconstructed and a

NEW 3 STORY BUILDING (97,000 sf)

new parking garage structure would be constructed at the north end of the property.)

•

Lengthy entitlement process to rezone the property

Recommendations • Option 2

ALLOWABLE BUILDABLE VOLUME WITH SETBACKS AND MAXIMUM HEIGHT

City of Boulder • Facilities Master Plan • Public Safety Building Options Analysis

DRAFT

Increased interior square footage

CONS

PROS

Less

Secure Fleet Parking

Yes

Addition of Sally Port

Yes

This option does not meet the recommended square footage.

Firing Range

Yes

This option does not meet the recommended square footage.

Phasing

$$$

Challenging

Easy

This option presents some phasing challenges.

Constructabillity New Buildings are less challenging, but site constraints extensive

Challenging

Easy

3. Facility Opportunities/Constraints Future Growth Potential This option maxes out the site.

Limited

Opportunistic

Limited

Opportunistic

Building Form Potential The existing site and building significantly limit the options for building form for the addition.

Recommendations • Option 2

KPI 1: KPI 2: KPI 3: KPI 4: KPI 5:

DRAFT

Letter B+

Flood Vulnerability Wild Fire Vulnerability Disaster Readiness Community Shelter "Essential" building

Sustainable (core value weighting=10%)

Accessible and Equitable (core value weighting=5%)

C+

Experiential (core value weighting=20%)

Economical (core value weighting=5%)

Functional (core value weighting=30%)

B+

Overall Score

A-

KPI 1: KPI 2: KPI 3:

2. Construction Considerations Construction Cost

DRAFT

Resilient (core value weighting=30%)

KPI 1: KPI 2: KPI 3: KPI 4:

This option does not meet the recommended square footage.

Conditioned Storage for Specialty Vehicles

DRAFT

FMP Scorecard

PSB Scorecard 1. Meets PSB Needs

DRAFT

KPI 1: KPI 2: KPI 1: KPI 2: KPI 3: KPI 1: KPI 2: KPI 3:

MEP Deferral Backlog Building Energy Use Intensity (EUI) Carbon Footprint Transportations Emissions Reductions ADA Compliance Inclusivity Accessibility

DRAFT

# 3.40 2 4 3 3 5 3.50 5 5 3 1 2.67 5 1 2 3.00 1 5 4.67 4 5 5 4.00 5 3 4

3.54

City of Boulder • Facilities Master Plan • Public Safety Building Options Analysis

DRAFT

Option 3

DRAFT

STATS New Build = 97,000 sf TOTAL = 97,000 SF per Staff ratio: 97,000/334 = 290 SF per Staff

New Build at East City Campus Relocate the Public Safety Building to the East City Campus. This would involve the construction of a new energy efficient facility co-located at the municipal campus.

NEW 3 STORY BUILDING (97,000 sf)

This presents options for the existing property: • Sell existing property • Lease existing building • Re-purpose for alternate use (e.g. Training Center to be shared with community partner)

APPARATUS BAY STRUCTURE (5,000 sf)

OVERALL PROGRAM

TOTAL OCCUPIED BUILDING = 486,00 TOTAL CONDITIONED STORAGE = 75 TOTAL SWAT STORAGE = 10,250 SF TOTAL FLEET = 32,300 SF TOTAL STRUCTURED PARKING = 1,02

PARKING STRUCTURE

This option would achieve:

•

Embodied Energy cost of replacing existing building

•

Improved ADA accessibility

•

Opportunity to improve inclusivity and accessibility per FMP guidelines

•

Increased square footage

PROPOSED SITE BOUNDARY - 27 AC.

All-electric building with Net Zero potential

•

P o P o P o P o P o P o P o P o P o P o P o P o P o P o P o P o P o P o P o P o P o P o P o P o P o P o P o P o P o P o P o P o P o P o P o P o P o P o P o P o P o P o P o P o P o P o P o P o P o P o P o P o P o P o P o P o P o P o P o P o P o P o P o P o P o P o P o P o P o P o P o P o

P o

Reduces flood vulnerability (ECC planned to be removed from floodplain)

P o

•

P o P o P o P o P o

P o

P o P o

SECON

P o P o P o P o P o

P o

P o P o P o P o P o P o P o P o

P o

P o P o P o P o P o P o P o

P o

P o P o P o P o P o

P o

P o P o P o

P o

P o P o P o

P o P o

PUBLIC ROAD EXTENSION P o

P o

60 FT ROW WITH 100' DIA CUL DE SAC P o

P o

P o P o P o P o P o P o

FACILITI

P o P o P o P o P o P o P o P o P o P o P o P o P o P o P o P o P o o

C AT V

P o

C AT V

P o P o

C AT V

P o

C AT V

P o

C AT V

P o

C AT V

P o

C AT V

P o

C AT V

P o P o P o P o P o P o P o P o P o P o

P o P o

P o

E ELS ABOV

C AT V

P o

P o P o

GRADE,

2 LEVELS

C AT V

BELOW

P o

2 LEV

P o

P o P o

P o

LES P o

P o

o P

P o P o

P o

P o P o P o

P o

P o P o P o

P o

- 10,250

TOTAL SF

P o

SAFETY

P o P o

HIC SWAT VE P o

P o

Increased opportunities for future growth

PUBLIC

P o

P o P o

P o P o P o

P o

P o P

P o

P o P o P o

o P o

P o o

P o P o

P o P o P o

P o

P o P o

P o

P o P o

P o

P o P o

P o

E P

P o

P o P o

P o P o P o P o P o

P o

P o P o

P o P

P o P o P o

P o

P o P

P o

P o o

P o P o

P o P o P o

P o

P o P o P o P o

P o P o

P o o

P o P o

P o

P P o

P o

P o P o

P o

P o o

P o

P o P o P o P o P

P o

P o P o P o

P o

P o P o P

P o

P o P o P o

P o

P o P

P o

•

P o

PARCEL F

4 C AT V

P o

R LEV CES PE S 130 SPA CE APPROX EL = 390 SPA CES 3 LEV = 520 SPA 4 LEVEL

C AT V

P o o

C AT V

P o o

C AT V

P o

Co-location opportunities

ETY

P o

•

PER 31,000 SF - 93,000 SF SF TOTAL

P o P

BUILDING SAFETY PUBLIC THREE FLOORS FLOOR

H FLOOR

P o P

Enclosed garage for specialty vehicles

ITIES 3 FLO (ALL); UTIL ); TRANSP INT FOOTPR 35,100 SF 2ND FLOOR 25,200 SF 3RD FLOOR 25,200 SF 4TH FLOOR 25,200 SF - 110,700 SF SF TOTAL

ES (ALL

URE

CT SAF G STRUCENTER, PUBLIC PARKIN IONS S OPERAT H BUILDING ICLES FOR FOR BOT , STAFF BUILDING

FLEET VEH P

GH FOURT

NTER RKS CE C WOMS, LOBBY D PUBLI ONS ANSHOPS/MUSTER ROO ONLY) DEPTS OR OPERATI VE FOR (ALL); P&R (OPS FIRST FLO ORS ABO

P o

PPoo P o P o P o P o P o P o P o P o P o P o P o P o P o P o P o P o P o P o P o P o P o P o P o P o P o P o P o P o P o P o P o P o P o P o P o P o

P o P o P o P o P o P o P o P o

•

D THROU

P o P o P o P o P o P o

P o P o P o

P o P P o

P o

P o P o

P o

P o P o

FUELING

CITY OFFICES AND AMENITIES

P o P o

P o

P o P o

P o

56,700 SF FOOTPRINT THREE FLOORS TOTAL SF - 170,100 SF

STORAGE

37,840 SF

P o

WATER QUALITY POND STORAGE

P o

To accomplish this would require:

P o

E P o

P o

E E E

P o

CAMPUS GREEN

FLEET AND WASH GROUND FLOOR 26,300 SF SECOND FLOOR 6,000 SF TOTAL SF 32,300 SF

P o P o P o P o P o P o P o P o P o P o P o P o P o P o

2 PUBLIC AMENITIES 56,700 SF FOOTPRINT TWO FLOORS TOTAL SF - 113,400 SF

FLEET READY LINE - 66 SPACES E E E

Lengthy entitlement process to rezone the property

P o

•

P o

Simple construction and no phasing required

P o

•

P o

Apparatus Bay Structure for specialty vehicle parking

P o

•

P o

Shared parking structure

8 SPAC ES

P o P o P o

P o

•

4 SPAC ES

P o P o

EL EV RL PE S ES PACE S AC E SP 390 S PAC 0 = 13 W 0S LO OX EL 52 BE PR 3 LEV EL = LS AP EV VE 4L LE ,2 DE RA G VE BO SA EL EV 2L R PA

P o

Include new firing range facility as part of new construction

G KIN

P o

•

2 P o

High Performance construction

P o

•

P o

New Building

P o

•

WINTER MATERIALS STORAGE

P o

P o P o P o P o P o P o P o P o P o P o P o P o P o P o P o P o P o P o P o P o P o P o P o P o P o P o P o P o P o P o P o P o P o P o P o P o P o P o P o P o P o P o P o P o P o P o P o P o P o P o P o P o P o P o P o P o P o P o P o P o P o

P o

P o P o P o P o P o P o

P o

P o P o P o P o P o P o

P o

P o P o P o P o P o P o

P o

P o P o P o P o P o P o

P o

P o P o P o P o P o P o

P o

P o P o P o P o P o P o

P o

P o P o P o P o P o P o

P o

P o P o P o P o P o P o

P o

o P o P o P o P o P o P o

P o

P o P o P o P o P o P o P o

P o

P o P o P o P o P o P o P o

P o

P o P o P o P o P o P o

P o

P o P o P o P o P o P o

P o

P o P o P o P o P o P o

P o

P o P o P o P o P o P o

P o

P o P o P o P o P o P o

P o

P o P o P o P o P o P o

P o

P o P o P o P o P o P o

P o

P o P o P o P o P o P o

P o

P o P o P o P o P o P o P o

P o

P o P o

P o P o P o P o P o

P o

o P o P o P o P o P o P o

P o

o P o P o P o P o P o P o

P P o

o P o P o P o P o P o P o

P P o

o P o P o P o P o

SCALE: 1" = 100'-0"

P o P o

P P o

o P o P o P o P o P o P o

P o

P o P o P o P o P o P o P o

P o

P o P o P o P o P o P o P o

P o

P o P o

City of Boulder • Facilities Master Plan • Public Safety Building Options Analysis o

Scale: 1" = 100'-0"

P o P o

Recommendations • Option 3

EASTERN CITY CAMPUS - FULL BUILDOUT - LAYDOWN STORAGE OFF SITE

100

100 FT

DRAFT

Increased interior square footage

CONS

PROS

Less

Secure Fleet Parking

Yes

Addition of Sally Port

Yes

This option does not meet the recommended square footage.

Conditioned Storage for Specialty Vehicles This option does not meet the recommended square footage.

Phasing

$$$

Challenging

Easy

This option presents some phasing challenges.

Constructabillity New Buildings are less challenging, but site constraints extensive

Challenging

Easy

3. Facility Opportunities/Constraints Future Growth Potential This option maxes out the site.

Limited

Opportunistic

Limited

Opportunistic

Building Form Potential The existing site and building significantly limit the options for building form for the addition.

Recommendations • Option 3

KPI 1: KPI 2: KPI 3: KPI 4: KPI 5:

DRAFT

Letter B+

Flood Vulnerability Wild Fire Vulnerability Disaster Readiness Community Shelter "Essential" building

Sustainable (core value weighting=10%)

Accessible and Equitable (core value weighting=5%)

C+

Experiential (core value weighting=20%)

Economical (core value weighting=5%)

Functional (core value weighting=30%)

B+

Overall Score

KPI 1: KPI 2: KPI 3:

2. Construction Considerations Construction Cost

DRAFT

Resilient (core value weighting=30%)

KPI 1: KPI 2: KPI 3: KPI 4:

This option does not meet the recommended square footage.

Firing Range

DRAFT

FMP Scorecard

PSB Scorecard 1. Meets PSB Needs

DRAFT

KPI 1: KPI 2: KPI 1: KPI 2: KPI 3: KPI 1: KPI 2: KPI 3:

MEP Deferral Backlog Building Energy Use Intensity (EUI) Carbon Footprint Transportations Emissions Reductions ADA Compliance Inclusivity Accessibility

DRAFT

# 4.20 4 4 4 4 5 4.00 5 5 3 3 4.33 5 4 4 4.50 4 5 4.00 4 4 4 5.00 5 5 5

4.48

City of Boulder • Facilities Master Plan • Public Safety Building Options Analysis

DRAFT

Evaluation provided by studiotrope Design Collective 2942 Welton St Denver, CO 80205 303.308.1144

DRAFT

Option 1A: Summary for Cost Estimation Renovation and Addition at 1805 33rd Street This option keeps the PSB at the existing location and maximizes allowable floor area per the F.A.R. restrictions within the current zoning for the property. To accomplish this would require: •

Partial renovation of existing building to improve layout and accommodate enlarging select existing programmatic elements • Including reconfiguring partitions and associated MEP changes

•

A large addition would be constructed to increase square footage. • Raised Construction to avoid floodplain and maintain surface parking below • High performance construction

•

2 story parking structure

•

Construction would be phased and complex to maintain key functions of the existing building operational

• •

DRAFT

KEY STATS Existing Bldg to be Renovated = 72,000sf Addition = 16,900 sf TOTAL = 88,900 (Amount short of recommendation = 8,100 sf) SF per Staff ratio: 88,900/334 = 266 SF per Staff

ADDITION W/ SURFACE PARKING BELOW (16,900 sf)

Deep Energy Retrofit of existing building • Majority of Building Systems (HVAC) will be replaced in full. (likely at end of useful life at time of project) • Extensive upgrades to exterior envelope to meet Boulder Energy Code including window replacement and increased insulation

•

DRAFT

EXISTING BUILDING RENOVATION:(72,084 sf) EXISTING STORAGE REMAINS

Sitework and Utilities • Minimal Sitework outside of boundaries of addition and parking structure • Minimal below grade utility work • Electrical Service upgrade likely if pursue all electric mechanical system

PARKING STRUCTURE (12,600 sf)

ALLOWABLE BUILDABLE VOLUME WITH SETBACKS AND MAXIMUM HEIGHT

Recommendations • Option 1A: Summary for Cost Estimation

City of Boulder • Facilities Master Plan • Public Safety Building Options Analysis

DRAFT

Option 1B: Summary for Cost Estimation Renovation and Addition at 1805 33rd Street This option keeps the PSB at the existing location and increases square footage to the recommended facility size.

DRAFT

STATS Existing Bldg to be Renovated = 72,000sf Addition = 25,000 sf TOTAL = 97,000 SF per Staff ratio: 97,000/334 = 290 SF per Staff

ADDITION W/ SURFACE PARKING BELOW (25,000 sf) EXISTING BUILDING RENOVATION:(72,084 sf)

To accomplish this would require: •

•

Partial renovation of existing building to improve layout and accommodate enlarging select existing programmatic elements • Including reconfiguring partitions and associated MEP changes

•

A large addition would be constructed to increase square footage. • Raised Construction to avoid floodplain and maintain surface parking below • High performance construction

•

2 story parking structure

•

Construction would be phased and complex to maintain key functions of the existing building operational

• •

EXISTING STORAGE REMAINS

PARKING STRUCTURE (17,000 sf)

ALLOWABLE BUILDABLE VOLUME WITH SETBACKS AND MAXIMUM HEIGHT

Recommendations • Option 1B: Summary for Cost Estimation

City of Boulder • Facilities Master Plan • Public Safety Building Options Analysis

DRAFT

Option 2: Summary for Cost Estimation Renovation and Addition at 1805 33rd Street This option keeps the PSB at the existing location, but replaces the existing facility with a new energy efficient building..

To accomplish this would require: •

New Building • High Performance construction • Floodproof construction • All electric mechanical system

•

Existing underground firing range facility left in place and incorporated into design of new building over top of the structure.

•

2 story parking structure

•

Apparatus Bay Structure for specialty vehicle parking

•

Construction would be phased and complex to maintain key functions of the existing building operational. • (The existing south addition would be demolished and new building would be built on the south end of the property. When complete the original

DRAFT

STATS Existing Bldg to remain = 7,000sf New Build = 90,000 sf TOTAL = 97,000 SF per Staff ratio: 97,000/334 = 290 SF per Staff

SURFACE PARKING AND OUTDOOR PLAZA

Demolition of existing two story building except for basement structure and storage sheds.

•

DRAFT

PARKING STRUCTURE (29,000 sf) APPARATUS BAY STRUCTURE

building would be deconstructed and a new parking garage structure would be constructed at the north end of the property.) •

Sitework and Utilities • Sitework to reconfigure parking and landscaping around new building. • Changes likely to underground utilities. • New Electrical Service to new building

EXISTING UNDERGROUND FIRING RANGE FACILITY (7,000 sf) NEW 3 STORY BUILDING (97,000 sf) ALLOWABLE BUILDABLE VOLUME WITH SETBACKS AND MAXIMUM HEIGHT

Recommendations • Option 2: Summary for Cost Estimation

City of Boulder • Facilities Master Plan • Public Safety Building Options Analysis

DRAFT

Option 3: Summary for Cost Estimation

DRAFT

STATS New Build = 97,000 sf TOTAL = 97,000 SF per Staff ratio: 97,000/334 = 290 SF per Staff

New Build at East City Campus Relocate the Public Safety Building to the East City Campus. This would involve the construction of a new energy efficient facility co-located at the municipal campus.

NEW 3 STORY BUILDING (97,000 sf)

To accomplish this would require: •

New Building • High Performance construction • All Electric Mechanical System • Include new indoor firing range facility as part of new construction with • • •

APPARATUS BAY STRUCTURE (5,000 sf)

OVERALL PROGRAM

TOTAL OCCUPIED BUILDING = 486,00 TOTAL CONDITIONED STORAGE = 75 TOTAL SWAT STORAGE = 10,250 SF TOTAL FLEET = 32,300 SF TOTAL STRUCTURED PARKING = 1,02

PARKING STRUCTURE

Lead collection sound dampening Ventilation

PROPOSED SITE BOUNDARY - 27 AC.

Shared parking structure

•

P o P o P o P o P o P o P o P o P o P o P o P o P o P o P o P o P o P o P o P o P o P o P o P o P o P o P o P o P o P o P o P o P o P o P o P o P o P o P o P o P o P o P o P o P o P o P o P o P o P o P o P o P o P o P o P o

Apparatus Bay Structure for specialty vehicle parking

P o P o P o

SECON

P o P o P o

P o

P o P o P o

P o P o

PUBLIC ROAD EXTENSION P o

P o

60 FT ROW WITH 100' DIA CUL DE SAC P o

P o

P o P o P o P o P o

FACILITI

P o P o P o P o P o P o P o P o P o P o P o P o

P o P

P o o

C AT V

P o o

P o P o

P o

C AT V

P o

C AT V

P o

C AT V

P o

AT V C AT V

P o

C AT V

P o P o P o P o P o P o P o P o P o

P o P o

P o

E ELS ABOV

P o

P o P o

P o

C AT V

GRADE,

2 LEVELS

C AT V

BELOW

2 LEV

P o

PARCEL F

4 C AT V

P o

R LEV CES PE S 130 SPA CE APPROX EL = 390 SPA CES 3 LEV = 520 SPA 4 LEVEL

C AT V

P o o

C AT V

P o o

C AT V

PER 31,000 SF - 93,000 SF SF TOTAL

P o

BUILDING SAFETY PUBLIC THREE FLOORS FLOOR

ETY

C AT V

Sitework and Utilities • Complete new sitework including • Parking lot and drive lanes • Landscaping and sidewalks • Plan for entire site to be raised with fill to bring out of the floodplain • New underground utilities • New electrical service

P o P

H FLOOR

P o

ITIES 3 FLO (ALL); UTIL ); TRANSP INT FOOTPR 35,100 SF 2ND FLOOR 25,200 SF 3RD FLOOR 25,200 SF 4TH FLOOR 25,200 SF - 110,700 SF SF TOTAL

ES (ALL

URE

CT SAF G STRUCENTER, PUBLIC PARKIN IONS S OPERAT H BUILDING ICLES FOR FOR BOT , STAFF BUILDING

FLEET VEH P

GH FOURT

NTER RKS CE C WOMS, LOBBY D PUBLI ONS ANSHOPS/MUSTER ROO ONLY) DEPTS OR OPERATI VE FOR (ALL); P&R (OPS FIRST FLO ORS ABO

P o

PPoo P o P o P o P o P o P o P o P o P o P o P o P o P o P o P o P o P o P o P o P o P o P o P o P o P o P o P o P o P o P o P o P o P o P o P o P o

P o P o P o P o P o P o P o P o

P o

P o P o

P o

LES P o

P o

o P

P o P o

P o

P o P o P o

P o

P o P o P o

P o

- 10,250

TOTAL SF

P o

P o P o

HIC SWAT VE P o

P o

SAFETY

P o

PUBLIC

P o P o

P o P

P o

P o P o P o P o P o P o

P o o

P o

P o P o P o

o P

P o

P o P o

P o

P o P o P o

P o

P o P

E P

P o P o

P o

P o P o P o P o P

P o

P o P o

P o P

P o P o P

P o

P o P o

P o

P o P

P o

P o o

P o P

P o P o

P o

P o P o

P o

P o P o P o P o

P o P o

P o

P o o

P o P o

P o

P o P o

P o

P o P o o

P o

P o P o P o P o

P o

P o P o P o

P o

P o P o P

P o

P o P o

P o

P o P o P

P o P o P o

P o P P o

P o

P o P o

P o

P o P o

FUELING

CITY OFFICES AND AMENITIES

P o P o

P o

P o P o

P o

56,700 SF FOOTPRINT THREE FLOORS TOTAL SF - 170,100 SF

STORAGE

37,840 SF

P o

WATER QUALITY POND STORAGE

P o

E E E

P o

4 SPAC ES

P o

CAMPUS GREEN

FLEET AND WASH GROUND FLOOR 26,300 SF SECOND FLOOR 6,000 SF TOTAL SF 32,300 SF

8 SPAC ES

P o

P o P o P o

•

D THROU

P o

•

P o P o P o P o P o P o P o P o P o P o P o P o P o P o P o P o

P o P o P o P o P o P o P o P o P o P o P o P o P o P o P o P o P o P o P o P o P o P o P o P o P o P o P o P o P o P o P o P o P o P o P o P o P o P o

EL EV RL PE S ES PACE S AC E SP 390 S PAC 0 = 13 W 0S LO OX EL 52 BE PR 3 LEV EL = LS AP EV VE 4L LE ,2 DE RA G VE BO SA EL EV 2L ST

P o

G KIN

P o P o

R PA

P o P o P o P o P o P o P o P o P o P o P o P o P o P o P o P o P o P o P o P o P o P o

2 PUBLIC AMENITIES 56,700 SF FOOTPRINT TWO FLOORS TOTAL SF - 113,400 SF

FLEET READY LINE - 66 SPACES E E E

WINTER MATERIALS STORAGE

P o

P o P o P o P o P o P o

P o

P o P o P o P o P o P o

P o

P o P o P o P o P o P o

P o

P o P o P o P o P o P o

P o

P o P o P o P o P o P o

P o

P o P o P o P o P o P o

P o

P o P o P o P o P o P o

P o

P o P o P o P o P o P o

P o

o P o P o P o P o P o P o

P o

P o P o P o P o P o P o P o

P o

P o P o P o P o P o P o P o

P o

P o P o P o P o P o P o

P o

P o P o P o P o P o P o

P o

P o P o P o P o P o P o

P o

P o P o P o P o P o P o

P o

P o P o P o P o P o P o

P o

P o P o P o P o P o P o

P o

P o P o P o P o P o P o

P o

P o P o P o P o P o P o

P o

P o P o P o P o P o P o P o

P o

P o P o

P o P o P o P o P o

P o

o P o P o P o P o P o P o

P o

o P o P o P o P o P o P o

P P o

o P o P o P o P o P o P o

P P o

o P o P o P o P o

SCALE: 1" = 100'-0"

P o P o

P P o

o P o P o P o P o P o P o

P o

P o P o P o P o P o P o P o

P o

P o P o P o P o P o P o P o

P o

P o P o

City of Boulder • Facilities Master Plan • Public Safety Building Options Analysis o

Scale: 1" = 100'-0"

P o P o

Recommendations • Option 3: Summary for Cost Estimation

EASTERN CITY CAMPUS - FULL BUILDOUT - LAYDOWN STORAGE OFF SITE

100

100 FT